If that one about multiple people from a team committing murders applied to me and my team, then I couldn't see it. But also, it wouldn't have just involved me.
Maybe he had an item that let him take a sneak peak? Or a secret correspondence with the dead told him.
Or he's just trying to get voted for so he can be with his terrible friends.
I guess any of those can be possible. Haru's right, we'd have to have an idea who Scaramouche's killer was and see if they had a clue about the hidden achievement.
And since we never force people to strip or anything, we would've missed it. Plus there's a bunch of people who just came back from those adventures, so. We could have overlooked anything.
I do still think it's weird and invasive but it should be a thing if we really have a suspect narrowed down. So maybe we ought to rethink our strategy for getting people to agree in those instances.
I don't disagree. [ WHO LIKES STRIPPING. ] It's unfortunate that we can't come up with suspect lists faster and earlier. Checking even a list of five can take a lot of time if we want to do it thoroughly.
He would have much less reason to lie about that, though. Everyone could already remember that he investigated the rink with you, and it wouldn't implicate him as not being possessed.
But you're right. He can't be trusted. Not completely.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
If that one about multiple people from a team committing murders applied to me and my team, then I couldn't see it. But also, it wouldn't have just involved me.
Maybe he had an item that let him take a sneak peak? Or a secret correspondence with the dead told him.
Or he's just trying to get voted for so he can be with his terrible friends.
[live francy.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[ Wow... ]
no subject
no subject
[ ... ]
Arguing for strip check would be difficult to begin with. So many were against it the first time.
[ ONE OF THEM WAS HIM. YOU, TOO. ]
no subject
I do still think it's weird and invasive but it should be a thing if we really have a suspect narrowed down. So maybe we ought to rethink our strategy for getting people to agree in those instances.
no subject
[ the constraints of trial.... ]
no subject
[ BECAUSE EVERYONE ELSE IS DEAD OR WAS OOC OUT ]
There's also the broken phone. Rin brought up that someone could've taken Shouki's, to cover for theirs being gone.
no subject
I imagine they would have gotten a replacement by now, too. Belongings disappear, likely back to their owners.
no subject
[ 100 times. ]
I don't think it's a good lead at this point...
no subject
[ THAT WOULD BE SO FUNNY ]
no subject
[ DESPITE HIMSELF.. HE IS A LITTLE AMUSED..... ]
no subject
I think they wouldn't be able to live it down.
[ THEY PROB WOULD ALSO GET EXECUTED, but this isn't about that. ]
no subject
Even if they didn't get voted for, they'd have to live with that shame.
no subject
no subject
[ also we don't get mail on weekends ]
no subject
...Should we try to ask Totty, then?
[Looking sour about it but if it's for the plot then needs must]
no subject
[ still kind of hoping to find the missing killer but. you know. who knows if that'll happen. totty's an option. ]
no subject
But you're right. He can't be trusted. Not completely.
no subject
no subject
Fair.